Marie Julie Jahenny of La Fraudais's prophesies are often used by ultra traditionalists to refer to the mass since Vatican ii the New Rite of Novus Ordo. They claim that the because of the words used render the consecration of the mass invalid and that the Pope himself is not a true Pope and neither are our Bishops. Therefore, they say that the bread and wine are not transubstantiated and do not become the body and blood of Christ. In addition to this Marie Julie's revelations are not approved by the Church . Because of this there is a tendancy to dump her.
But in fact I believe her prohesies may be true, not as regarding Vatican 2 but as regarding the emerging and coming schism within the Catholic Church. We have numerous people in the Church who are, effectively Protestants but continue to practice as though they are Catholics in good faith , but are not.
Thia is one of the main reasons why conversions are falling off and our Church's are becoming empty, because the fullness of the Faith is no longer taught from very many of our seminaries, Universities, schools, colleges and pulpits, more pf concern this New Protestantism has very, very, strong roots in our Religious Orders. This is much more dangerous than during the so called 'Reformation' when the various Protestant sects came right out in the open and marched away from Rome. In some sense their influence was greatly reduced by this in that their heresy was obvious. Not so now, when their poison was within. Our present Holy Father and Pope John Paul took a strong stand against this but there will come a time when the pay off from remaining within the Church will not equal that of going out to outright schism. One of the very first things these schismatics will do at the urging of the devil will be to rewrite the Order of the Mass so that the Consecration is invalidated as Marie Julie suggests.
I speculate that this schism will take place under a future Pope who will throw the gauntlet down to these new Protestants by insisting they conform to Orthodoxy. Perhaps by reinstiituting some kind of Oath as Saint Pope Pius 19th did. Its even possible Pope Benedict will do so:
'THE OATH AGAINST MODERNISM
Given by His Holiness St. Pius X September 1, 1910.
To be sworn to by all clergy, pastors, confessors, preachers, religious superiors, and professors in philosophical-theological seminaries.
I . . . . firmly embrace and accept each and every definition that has been set forth and declared by the unerring teaching authority of the Church, especially those principal truths which are directly opposed to the errors of this day. And first of all, I profess that God, the origin and end of all things, can be known with certainty by the natural light of reason from the created world (see Rom. 1:90), that is, from the visible works of creation, as a cause from its effects, and that, therefore, his existence can also be demonstrated: Secondly, I accept and acknowledge the external proofs of revelation, that is, divine acts and especially miracles and prophecies as the surest signs of the divine origin of the Christian religion and I hold that these same proofs are well adapted to the understanding of all eras and all men, even of this time. Thirdly, I believe with equally firm faith that the Church, the guardian and teacher of the revealed word, was personally instituted by the real and historical Christ when he lived among us, and that the Church was built upon Peter, the prince of the apostolic hierarchy, and his successors for the duration of time. Fourthly, I sincerely hold that the doctrine of faith was handed down to us from the apostles through the orthodox Fathers in exactly the same meaning and always in the same purport. Therefore, I entirely reject the heretical' .......
CF
http://www.papalencyclicals.net/Pius10/p10moath.htm
Its funny we should be writing about this . I woke up late yesterday and so had to go down to my ultra modern Catholic Parish Church yesterday to mass, something I avoid as much as a possibly can. The local PP must have been away on holiday and a member of a religious order said mass and preached the sermon. After listening a little while I placed me hands over my ears as what he was saying was pure poison especially on the Feast of Corpus Christi. Sadly hands over ears or not I could still hear what he was saying.
One of the things he said was that the purpose of the Renewal of Vatican 2 was to back to the 'pure' faith and practices of the primitive Church. This is pure Protestantism and exactly what the Protestant 'Reformers' wished to do. Thus the Traditions of the Church grown in wisdom and grace are discarded. So for instance if we follow such a model we ask ourselves the question, continually what did the Early Christians do?
Did they have statues? No So dump the statues.
Our Church has no statues.
Did they have religious pictures? No . So dump the pictures.
Our Church has no Holy Pictures.
Did they have devotional practices. No .
Our Church now has no devotional practices.
In fact in many respects my local Church is much more Protestant in many ways than very many Protestant Churches which have returned in many cases to Traditional Catholic Practices.
The Preacher highly praised our Church for its art and architecture. This not surprise me in the least.
At the end of the day we shall be judged on love.